You might be interested in Michael Medved's book, Hollywood vs. America.
He has a chapter (or several of them) on Hollywood's "attack" on religion
and the Catholic church. Check it out at the library an puruse these
chapters, I think you will enjoy it. Be forwarned that there are portions
of this book that are rather graphic. So, I advise you to read it with
caution.
The church will come around on the subject of women priests, just as the
Anglican church has. Progress is slow in any very large organisation. A lot
of the leaders of the church are old men and it's hard for them to shift
away from the values they have stuck to all their lives. I'm afraid
attitudes to the church will take a long time to progress too.
but doesn't the catholic church judge people as well? that's the impression
i've been under.
The problem with most organised religions is they are simply too rigid in
comparison with the fluidity of human socio-evolution.
Check out Sean Forrest's radio show on Monday nights. You might be
interested.
www.mwts.org
There was also the 72 minutes long documentary "Hollywood vs. Catholicism",
produced in 1996 by the Chatham Hill Foundation of Dallas, Texas (intended
for an adult audience because it includes explicit material), which goes in
the same line of what Mr. Michael Medved has written and said (if I
remember well he is not Catholic but as a critic recognizes some facts
about how Hollywood favours scripts that affect various religions and their
morals). Every faith of religious human groups has its own views --- and
mistakes, because no human is perfect; we still have to wait for Jesus
Christ to come again and until then we have to set some rules; those rules
have been perfected through the centuries, since society evolves along with
its knowledge. Pope John Paul II admitted some mistakes of the past. The
Catholic faith is specially targeted by the media and some opinion leaders
because of its important comparative size in the world.
As a male Catholic I'm not opposed to female priests in the future; female
deacons were unheard of in the past and now there are women in that
function. Jesus had male and female disciples, and if He chose male
apostles back then for his special mission it can be because it was a very
different time -- it was the society then that picked one gender as the
most effective one to spread the Gospel in the difficult years that
followed. And women seemed to be behind them all the time but it's also
possible that their achievements weren't recognized by lasting documents.
However, the first person Jesus talked to after his resurrection was a
woman; that has to mean something too.